Search for: "Unilever PLC" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 3:15 am
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 354 "The words 'that person' in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 referred to a notional non-connected counterparty operating in the appropriate market at the appropriate time. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:42 am by sally
Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1283; [2010] WLR (D) 300 “‘That person’ in s 41(2) of the Patents Act 1977 meant the actual assignee with its actual attributes rather than a notional non-connected counterparty operating in the appropriate market at the appropriate time. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:29 pm
The most remarkable aspect of Unilever Plc v S C Johnson & Son Inc [2012] EWPCC 19 (25 May 2012) is that this action took place in the Patents County Court rather than the Patents Court or before the Comptroller. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by The Editor , CMS
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:25 am
Colworth House, Unilever's Research and Development Facility Author  Lecomte99   Copyright waived by the author   Source Wikipedia Colworth House Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Kitchin) Shanks v Unilever Plc  [2019] UKSC 45 (23 Oct 2019) Nowadays most commercially successful inventions in the United Kingdom are made by [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:15 pm by Alexis Domb
On July 9, 2014, a federal judge granted approval of a $10.2 million settlement in the Suave Keratin class action lawsuit, which alleged that Unilever PLC—the manufacturer of the Suave Keratin Infusion 30-Day Smoothing Kit—had engaged in the sale of defective products. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In accordance with standard Unilever policy, CRL assigned the rights in the invention to Unilever plc for £100. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:43 am
This appeal was a rare inventor’s compensation case. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:56 am
In June of that year his employer, Unilever Central Resources, transferred the patent to Unilever plc for a nominal consideration. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:06 pm
Approves Unilever, Alberto-Culver Combination, with DivestituresThis posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.To resolve U.S. antitrust concerns over its proposed $3.7 billion acquisition of Alberto-Culver Co., Unilever N.V. has agreed to divestures intended to preserve competition for value shampoo, value conditioner, and hairspray sold in retail stores.The Department of Justice Antitrust Division filed a civil antitrust lawsuit on May 6 in the… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
., and Unilever plc expect to post losses as a result of the Peanut Company of America debacle. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:07 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crest Nicholson (Londinium) Ltd. v Akaria Investments Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 1331 (25 November 2010) Terluk v Berezovsky [2010] EWCA Civ 1345 (25 November 2010) Unilever Plc & Ors v Shanks [2010] EWCA Civ 1283 (25 November 2010) Habibsons Bank Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1335 (24 November 2010) Hanton-Rhouila v Westminster City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1334 (24 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:26 am
  The Court of Appeal has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of "outstanding benefit" in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:05 pm by hlewis@lawbc.com
  IBioIC was founded by Ingenza Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), and INEOS to connect academic expertise in synthetic biology with industrial capabilities from businesses in the area. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:46 pm
It's only now that this Kat has caught up with Unilever Plc v Société des Produits Nestlé SA, a decision of Dermot Doyle, on behalf of the Controller of the Irish Patents Office which dates back to 12 September. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 4:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
., 28 August 2011CanadaFinal statement of the Canadian NCP on the complaint by Frente de Defensa San Miguelense (FREDEMI) against the Marlin mine in Guatemala, 3 May 2011 Statements concerning Ivanhoe Mines Ltd in Burma and Ascendant Copper Corporation in Ecuador / Constatations concernant Ivanhoe Mines Ltd en Birmanie et Ascendant Copper Corporation en Équateur, 2006 Chile / ChiliProtocolo de acuerdo entre la empresa Unilever Chile y la Central Unitaria de… [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
Current members of the TMPDF are ARM Ltd; AstraZeneca plc; Babcock International Ltd; BAE Systems plc; BP p.l.c.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd;… [read post]